Americans apparently are showing deficiencies in vitamin D and there are myriad findings for the implications of these deficiencies and apparently just as many ideas about what to do about them. The most common suggestion seems to be upping the RDI and encouraging medical practitioners to give patients who seem to have deficiencies and/or issues that are now being connected to deficiencies high doses of vit. D supplements. The second solution is to increase the vitamin d in the food supply, already vitamin D is put into whole milk and also some orange juice. So this would increase the vitamin D intake of those who consume those foods, whether or not they have deficiencies.

I take issue with both solutions and here’s why. Vitamin D is only found in a few foods, and my inclination is that there is a reason for that. Most of our vitamin D is synthesized through exposure to the sun, and to avoid getting too much of the nutrient steroid hormone the body starts to block the synthesis process when we get too much (hence the darkening of the skin). These two facts seem to say, vitamin d is important but it’s not something to have in excess. That said, clearly our consumption of this nutrient steroid hormone would be in decline since so few of us now have livelihoods that bring us outside and even when we aren’t working, much of our time is spent under roofs. Then, even for those who do go outside there is that pesky dark and cold part of the year that makes it even more difficult. We also consume far fewer vitamin D rich foods, like organ meats, fish, and eggs.

I’m sorry if this seems too obvious, but instead of raising the consumption level of vitamin d to levels that the human body has maybe never experienced we should probably just increase our consumption of naturally vitamin D rich foods as was traditionally done, in the winter and spend some time outdoors when it’s nice out. This follows a very sound and traditional pattern of labor and consumption, meat and indoor activities in the winter, lots of veggies and sun in the spring and summer and fall. Why would supplementation be necessary since we have historically gotten what we need from food and being outside?
I guess it is this kind of controversy that draws me to premise of the research of Dr. Weston Price and the information put out by the Weston A Price foundation. The first question of his research was “is disease inherent?” He saw so much disease in his dental practice- in the mouth and beyond- he was moved to find out if this was just the plight of humanity or an expression of something wrong but preventable. So he looked for people in the world without disease and then looked to find out how they got to be in that lucky state. Dr. Daphne Miller did the same thing in her book. She found people who lacked certain chronic diseases and then looked to their traditions (mostly food traditions, but their lifestyle as a whole as well) to find out how they maintained that level of health. Miller and Price did not isolate a substance and call it a cure, though they did identify powerful foods (raw milk and raw milk products, cod liver oil, nopales, fermented foods, whole fats) that when eaten in their natural/whole state along with the regular traditional diet contributed to remarkable overall health. The research I have come across of sources of vitamin D may discuss co-factors (things the body needs to use something else) but never looks at the whole food. Complexity of a diet, maybe there is more to vitamin D rich foods than just vitamin D?
The lack of attention to traditional foods is a problem in general for health research and specifically the supplement solution this research often leads to, particularly through the food supply- putting substances in other substances where they don’t necessarily belong. (I talked about this before here, and it doesn’t seem beneficial) Maybe, just maybe, the world works the way it does for a reason and there is a good explanation for why milk doesn’t have vitamin d (human or cow). Not to mention orange juice. I think many would agree that our limited understanding of such complex processes might not lead us to the right conclusions and that we need a better point of reference for guiding what we put in our bodies than isolated scientific studies. If you feel like you need a reminder of how little we know about the body, check out the Human Microbiome Project.

I found this article interesting for pointing out the flaws in much of the research supporting increased D supplementation. They also have some useful observations of the role of money and industry in these recommendations, particularly the excitement over increased D fortification by those who produce the supplemented products and the concern that supplementation continues only in their foods so they can maintain that market edge. (A note about this article: the authors of that site have a particular understanding of the role of Vitamin D in the immune system and the relationship with pathogenic bacteria that the they suspect are responsible for chronic disease. Now, their whole theory is currently on the fringe and flies in the face of much research to date about immunity and particularly about vitamin d. But most research dealing with the role of microbes in our body is currently fringe because it is something we know so little about, and most of it flies in the face of what is currently known about such things as human development, physiology, immunity, and nutrition. But it makes sense that if we don’t understand something that makes up 90% of our cells we probably know very little about all that stuff over which that 90% has influence. Again, check out that Human Microbiome Project)

My general conclusion from looking into Vitamin D is that the problems and benefits of the hormone isn’t the hormone per se, but everything the hormone is involved in. And we know very little about all that, so what is our point of reference for understanding what the body needs beyond this limited reductionist view? The Weston A Price foundation can turn people off because the information is often self-referential and can seem too scrupulous or the recommendations too impractical. These are  fair assessments for the most part, but what I appreciate about their information is that they use traditional wisdom and foods in their whole form as a guide for what works and why. This practice doesn’t fit in with scientific method, but what if it did? What if, in addition to clinical trials, health researchers had to find out what the role of the substance they are researching was in traditional and healthy populations and then work from their on how to best utilize that substance for modern health issues. Vitamin D researchers might then see the role of the other fat soluble vitamins in balancing out the toxicity potential since they are often found together in foods. There might be better connections made with the role of fat in the diet and cholesterol in the body when looking at how the body makes and uses the hormone D. We might have avoided the low-fat craze if there had been a requirement to take into account fat in the diet of healthy people around the world.
The issue, as always, is that food as medicine in the traditional sense isn’t a very profitable enterprise. If it were, vitamin deficiencies of any kind would force us to look at what worked before the deficiency and to return to that practice. Instead of encouraging the sale of more pills, the National Institute of Health could support funding for outdoor education and workforce requirements for taking lunch breaks and walking/biking to work. Such suggestions may not seem practical, but at least we know they’ve worked for humanity thus far.

Photo Copyright. Mother and Father. 2009. HODGES & CO. all rights revealed

                          

The best of these interviews so far has been with Amy Goodman and Sharif Abdek Kouddous on Democracy Now. They tell him at the beginning that their “food rule” for him is “no sound bites” and he plays along (probably eager for the chance to elaborate really). Even if you have read his books and/or heard him talk, and he does do a lot of repeating, as I guess is necessary, this interchange is worth watching. As he does in the other interviews, he really brings together the complexity of the food culture with clear ways out of many of the tangles we’re in but he goes a bit deeper than the rest and seems a bit more forthright.

My favorite point is his mention of the feminist/labor issues around food and how processed food and classic feminism went, unfortunately, hand in hand due to the need for more income and less entrapment of women in a domestic role. I think this questions gets to the heart of our daily food life; who cooks for us, why don’t we cook ourselves, why don’t we prioritize the time and money to eat well? I really feel that addressing these questions and making changes that align with our heart-of-heart values with the answers can be really empowering, healing, and have great impact on the world.

My least favorite point is his use of the word “fat” as if there is one category and none of the members of that category have any distinction. I know he understands this because he is very current on the research on the role of fat in the diet. People generally understand that there a “good fats” and “bad fats” so he could just at least say “bad fats” but he could take it a step further and separate out whole, traditional fats from industrial oils. He does this already with meat. There is no such thing as meat as one category- there are animals that are eaten that have completely different diets and nutritional profiles even though they are technically the same animals. He explains that he eats less meat than he used to and he eats different meat than he used to (only grass fed for beef for example). I wish he would make the same distinction with fat. He mentioned that school lunches are so deplorable because it is the disposal method for surplus cheap food and because the meals have calorie minimums not maximums. He says the meals need to have less fat- well school lunches have low-fat milk, but we know that’s not really the best choice in terms of providing whole food. So schools have followed the low-fat mantra, but are still terribly unhealthy. He doesn’t really mean that they need less fat, they need less of the processed foods and chemicals that are contributing to disease and obesity in children, which is not whole milk- it is soda (which he does mention), and highly processed carbs, and industrial fats. I wouldn’t change much about what he said, and I don’t think he should bring down the ease with which he communicates by bringing this up in such a way (as I do), but it would help his message stay consistent if he would at least make a careful distinction in this regard.

                          

I stopped buying pre-made breadcrumbs not right after Alice Waters told me to make my own (via her book The Art of Simple Food) but when I stopped (mostly) eating wheat/grain products that aren’t fermented or soaked. The whole wheat panko we used to buy came in a plastic container and didn’t really get used much anyway. Now, I throw the heels of our Alvarado St. Sourdough Sprouted Grain (double whammy) sandwich bread into a waxed paper bag. Last night was the first time I actually remembered that I had that bag of heels on the top of the fridge and also had a distinct use for tasty breadcrumbs.

Two heels made plenty of crumbs for a 1/2lb of fish (which is just the right amount of fish for two people, another reason not to balk that the high cost of sustainable fish per pound- you don’t need very much)

I used our sauerkraut pounder, the instructions I’ve seen say to use the food processor, but that was too dish-intensive for something supposed to be simple. You could also use an empty bottle. I have  seen recipes that advise for bread to not be totally stale, which mine was…it turned out fine. If you can’t use actually stale bread, than what’s the point?

As neat as I think the breadcrumb resourcefulness was, I think this post is really just way to get in a word (at last) about my love for the waxed paper bag. It is a great alternative to plastic, which, for many foods, performs better due it’s ability to keep out moisture but allow the food to breathe, especially important for bread and cheese. A good ziplock, plastic wrap, or aluminum foil alternative. I highly recommend getting a pack of these compostable, handsome, handy items.

                          

I have begun working on other print projects since this piece was published, but it is now online and available to share. So share I will. The article is based on an interview with my granddad who grew up in the East Bay (where I currently live) in the Great Depression. We talked about eating, buying food, labor issues, family, and all those issues that come up when you talk about what we eat. Read on in the current issue of Edible East Bay

                          

She asked me about essential foods I keep on hand and how to deal with the eating at the rushed times during the day at breakfast and lunch.

Here’s something I know about my friend; she is a good cook. The problems she is having are not ultimately about a lack of skill, but a lack of inspiration from what she has on hand and feeling drained with the rest of life to take the time to cook. It seems like she is in a difficult cycle where her lack of time limits her creativity and ability to think through recipes so she goes out for more expensive food which limits her ability to spend a bit more at the store or market to get inspiring and easy foods to cook. I also know that she doesn’t really enjoy her job, so it’s even more frustrating that by giving so much of her energy to joylessly earning money she doesn’t have the time to live how she should like to live.

Given that many of us are in work that is not ultimately fulfilling it is even more important to make sure those hours we have outside of work are used wisely and towards meaningful, uplifting things. It is crucial to look at what those hours at work are paying for and whether or not the fruits are worth the labor, so to speak. Most of us see the majority of our paycheck go to housing. So unless you are living in a place beyond your means, that cost is going to be constant. There are other constants like insurance and debt payments. But much of our spending is up to us. The category of “non-essentials” can really be expanded to most of our living expenses. Particularly when you frame your expenses as hours working. Are the things we own and use worth this time?

Audit your spending, the things you own, what you do with your time and make sure you’re really getting what you want.

Then you can think about your grocery list. Where is your money going in the products that you buy? On a personal level does the food you buy make you feel good? Are you getting a balanced diet? What did you pay for in that food- packaging, processing, sugar, plastic, advertising? How did that purchase help or hinder a just and healthy community. Did your hard earned dollars go to an international corporation, or stay in your area? Did you help a family make a living?

While it’s easy to get overwhelmed by these questions what you are actually doing is narrowing down your choices and ultimately making choosing food much easier. There are only so many products that get positive answers to these questions of how the food makes us feel, are we being good local consumers by buying it? When I walk into a store I no longer feel bombarded with the infinite choices provided, I know that there are limits to what I will spend my scarce dollars on and I decide between only the products that meet those requirements.

Not only are there limits on the products I will buy, but there is also a clear limit on the money I will spend. Often, but not always, the products I will purchase are going to be more expensive than those I prefer not to support.

You are paying for different things with either choice. For conventional vegetables you pay for long distance transport, with packaged and/or processed foods you are paying for the marketing, transportation, labor.
For local and or organic food you support a family’s livelihood and way of life, clean air and water and soil, happy animals, living wages, healthcare.

Where I save with conventional we all pay eventually elsewhere. Where I spend with organic my community reaps the benefits in a cooler planet, healthier body (cheaper to care for), smaller landfills, a more stable and equal economy. Seems like a bargain now doesn’t it?

Additionally, assess your waste and buy less: waste in packaging, uncooked or un eaten food, how much of what you buy gets thrown away? (If you reflect the national average, that would about 14% of what you buy) and also waste in excess eating (how much of what you eat gets wasted trying to burn it off?)

Americans spend a smaller percentage of their income on food than people in any other country. We have seen food prices rise recently but are paying an historically low amount of what we make on food. In personal budgeting advice you will read that most people underestimate the amount of money they will or do spend on food. People end up overspending their budget because they were not realistic about how much they buy. This is only compounded by the recent increases in the price of food.

Here is how it plays out for us:

We have simplified our budgeting process by laying out the set expenses, the food and other shared items, and then the rest is up to us to spend or save. We have “personal cash” that goes to choices like clothing, getting lunch or dinner out or other treats, yoga, etc. Basically it comes down to those priorities and while we set them as a couple, we have a certain amount of free reign with the non-essentials. You can see we have a lot of our monthly income going to debt, and we didn’t stay exactly on target. It’s a learning process every month

While most Americans spend just under 10% of their income on food, we spend closer to 15%. So in many ways, when I discuss eating well on a tight budget it means looking at your overall spending in a new way.

That said, the one thing about a grocery bill is that most people buy much more at the store than food. So some of what you see in our grocery budget includes paper towels, toothpaste, shampoo etc. So our actual food spending is somewhat less.

Here is an illustration of other ways that we save:

Okay, so now I am at the store, with specific products I will and won’t buy, and a set budget to spend. What do I buy? I start with vegetables. In fact I don’t start at the store at all but the farmer’s market. We bring $20 to the market and we get what we can for the week. This means no meat, cheese, or prepared food just fruits and vegetables. The month of September (and October even more so) required less spending at the market due to the produce from the garden.

I start with in season vegetables and base the meals for the week on what I get. This is a great source of inspiration. I try to make sure these meals will provide enough leftovers to two of us to eat lunch after two have eaten dinner. Examples aplenty.

After the foundation of vegetables I shop in terms of meals. Beans, pasta, rice, other grains, eggs, ingredients for baking, oils and fats, some meats and dairy (yogurt, quart of milk, some cheese), spices and some sauces and broth. Then we get a few things that make life easier like snacks- popcorn, a bag of chips, salsa, rice cakes, peanut butter and jam. So its a progression to make sure the healthiest and most useful items for full meals are bought first and in the most abundance and then up from there until you’re at the set budget.

So, that is our process and what I can share. I think it’s wonderful to be inspired by food, prioritize the process and a way to spend time together. Learn new things, making it easier and easier each time. It’s hard to go wrong with simple and fresh ingredients. It seems to me that the economic situation will make the idea of people thinking of cooking a hobby sort of an absurdity, since we all eat we should all learn to manage that need in a way that is fun, engaging, and within our means.

And Delicious!

                          

 (note the eggs should actually be beaten before going in, but I took artistic license)

Making pasta, I have now learned is not hard at all. It’s not convenient or fast, but it certainly isn’t hard. But guess what else it is? Cheap! Yes. Homemade pasta from local organic flour and local organic cage free eggs is cheaper than organic dried pasta from italy or who knows where.

It breaks down like this: Eggs are ¢21 a piece. The super nice local flour feels like a lot at $12 for a 7lb bag, but it comes down to ¢51 per cup. One batch of pasta can be made with 1 egg and 1 c flour. Try buying delicious fresh pasta for ¢72

Toothsome eh?

Note on the shrimp and any previous or future meals with beautiful seafood. A main purpose of the Goods are Odd is about living Mind to Mouth. This is about using your gray matter to come up with rational and creative solutions to the problem of health and healthy food being seemingly limited to those with significant income. Rational and creative sometimes includes luck. Everyone seems to have their lucky hook-ups in one part of life or another. A lot of times in communal settings there is a good deal of sharing because no one has much except what they can offer through their job or family or other hobbies. Ours happens to be a hook up with delicious, fresh, sustainable fish. Are you reaching out to those around you and sharing the hook-ups you have in possible return for others? This requires talking to and connecting with your neighbors and co-workers, or potential friends on the internet and often being the first to be generous.