Skip to content

Keep it together: The need for whole food

To paraphrase Michael Pollan from his latest book, In Defense of Food, science has figured out pretty well now how to take apart food (going so far as the nucleus), but we are lousy at putting it back together. Though the foods we’ve fashioned over millennia do a great job keeping us at our best, physically and mentally, the modern age has tried to prove that science and technology can do better. Starting with the creation of baby formula in the 1930s, consisting of cow’s milk, wheat flour, malted flour, and potassium bicarbonate, modern food science has tried to understand the chemistry of food and nutrition to manufacture and market accordingly. And the real question with all this fiddling is, what’s the advantage?

Increasingly we seem to learn that there is mainly only disadvantage in the heavy processing and even the fortifying of foods. The more we learn about what whole foods have to offer, the more we seem to figure out that our refined-then-”enriched” versions are weak or even detrimental in comparison. A recent study of folic acid fortification shows flaws in the thinking that a vitamin is a vitamin is a vitamin no matter what the form or context.

Whole grains and greens are rich in folate, a B vitamin which has shown to be protective against colon cancer and other bowel issues and is just generally important for overall health. Folate deficiencies also cause fetal neural tube defects and thus pregnant women are urged to take a folic acid supplement. Folic acid is the supplement form of folate, and (doctors urging aside) does not impart the same positive results for cancer risk and whole-food derive folate. In fact as a recent NY Times article outlines, folic acid enriched foods may increase cancer risk.

This particular study lucked out with an easy control group (nutritional studies are difficult because control groups are hard to maintain) for folic acid consumption because Norway do not enrich their food with it like we do here in the US (lucky for the researchers and the Norwegians too apparently)

Turns out that folic acid enriched foods, mainly grains and cereals…um eaten particularly by children, increase cancer risk. So…no advantage there at all.

(Careful readers will note that the study of B vitamin consumption was originally aimed at understanding the relationship between B vitamins and heart disease, not cancer. In the previous post, on sick ancient Egyptians, this relationship was brought up as the likely cause of ancient cardio problems as the Egyptian Elite ate refined grains and were deficient in B vitamins that keep in check an amino acid that breaks down cell walls (which cholesterol goes in to fix…) I will not be at all surprised if the findings for b vitamins supplements (versus the stuff in whole foods) fails to show an impact on heart disease, but that will not be a good enough reason to discount the relationship until they look at food in the form it should be eaten. Maybe a start in the right direction to show the relationship to cancer)

Okay, so food in its most whole form provides all the nutrition we need without the fiddling from food scientists. Lesson: Avoid food with health claims and stick to those that have no package at all. That said, there are ways to “enrich” whole foods yourself and that is by pairing them with foods that help your body absorb all the goodness. And yes, this point loops back to the point about good fat and it being important and not causing heart disease.

I recently read author Nina Planck’s Real Food, What to Eat and Why. Of all of the points she made, I think the rundown of the usefulness of good quality whole fats in the diet was the most important. So I am just going to quote her verbatim: You can keep this all in mind with any catchy “holiday health hints” or such that tell you not to eat your turkey skin or eat low-fat dairy.

Eating protein with fat makes nutritional sense, because all food, and protein in particular , requires fat for proper digestion. As we saw with “rabbit starvation, without fat in the diet, digestion fails and you starve, but not for lack of calories. What is true of meat is true of all fat-and-protein pairs. They go together. Consider, for example, two near-perfect foods: eggs and milk. Both foods are a complete nutritional package, designed for a growing organism’s exclusive nutrition, and must contain everything the body needs to assimilate the nutrients they contain. The fats in the egg yolk aid digestion of the protein in the white, and lecithin in the yolk aid metabolism of its cholesterol. The butterfat in milk facilitates protein digestion, and saturated fat in particular is required to absorb the calcium. Calcium, in turn, requires vitamins A and D to be properly assimilated, and they are found only in the butterfat. Finally vitamin A is required for production of bile salts that enable the body to digest protein. Without the butterfat, then, you don’t get the best of the protein, fat-soluble vitamins, or calcium from milk. That’s why I don’t eat, and cannot recommend, egg white omelets and skim milk. They are low-quality, incomplete foods.

In each classic pair, fats help the body assimilate, use, or convert essential nutrient.

Fat and protein
Roast chicken (with the skin)
Eggs (with the yolks)

Fat and vitamins
Vitamins A, D,E and K are fat-soluble, eat them with fat

Fat and Beta-Carotene
Buttered carrots
Collards with fatback
Spinach salad with bacon
Flank steak with arugula
Beef with broccoli

Saturated fat and Omega-3 fats
Fish with butter or cream sauce

Saturated fat and calcium
Whole milk
Yogurt, cheese, and sour cream made from whole milk.

Each new piece of research reminds me that the most we should do with food is grow it in healthy soil, and prepare it in a way that our bodies can best use it. For some things that means raw (like dairy and fruit), eaten cooked or raw with some useful fats (like most veggies and meats), or fermented (particularly cabbage and other meant-to-ferment veggies as well as grains, ie sourdough, and some legumes ie soy)

Here are some particularly delicious whole meals:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

4 Comments

  1. Mom wrote:

    Sage, I appreciate your focus on the benefits of quality whole fats in our diet and the knowledge I gain through your introduction to and summaries of references such as Nina Planck’s work. I particularly liked your specific examples of pairings. Could you suggest examples of some meals that include multiple pairings (i.e., fermented, raw, fat + protein…). Thanks.

    Saturday, January 2, 2010 at 4:32 pm | Permalink
  2. Sage wrote:

    Well, ideally all meals would be a good balance of these important (and delicious) pairings. A checklist for any meal you are inspired to cook might be helpful…Let’s take my lunch as an example. I melted raw monterey jack cheese on a sprouted grain tortilla (from Ezekiel brand) which was sort of frying in some olive oil and butter (butter helps raise the smoking point of olive oil because the butter is saturated which is better for heat). I also put some black beans which had been soaked for about 20 hours and then simmered for about 4 hours and some cilantro. This quesadilla-esque thing was topped with some hot sauce. The fat of the cheese, butter, and olive oil was necessary to absorb the fat soluable nutrients in the soaked legumes and the sprouted grains, the cilantro and in the cheese itself. There are myriad other processes that occurred that we lucky don’t have to know about. To really make a nutrient dense meal that was easily absorbed I might have eaten some sauerkraut or washed it all down with some kombucha. Creme fraiche is a nice cultured dairy that goes beautifully with beans and spice.

    You can take any given meal you are preparing and check, how are the grains and legumes prepared? What quality of fats am I using? Are they whole fats that are helping my body use this food? Where is the life in my food? Do I have anything active to replenish my gut? Are the vegetables I am eating pepared and paired in a way that makes them useful? Do I have anything that is harmful or diminishing like the anti-nutrients in grains/nuts/legumes, foods damaged with high heat like puffed things, or refined grains/sugars?

    I think generally these are good broad guides. I love meals which lend themselves easily to a good balance of all this (like rice with eggs and sauerkraut, see post below), but I would think a balance over a day is fine too if each meal doesn’t have everything.

    Sunday, January 3, 2010 at 11:44 pm | Permalink
  3. Grant wrote:

    Have you heard of Dr. Trevor Marshall who has postulated that Vitamin D may not be a simple vitamin at all and that large amounts of it-either natural or supplemental, may interfere with the body’s immune response and actually aid in the spread of TH1 diseases? Here is a link to some good information. http://bacteriality.com/about-the-mp/

    Also, one of the most amusing things I have seen lately: The FDA has listed a weed called Purslane as the 7th most noxious weed threat in the world, while the USDA has arrived at the conclusion that it could be cultivated in almost all areas of the world and has such unusual qualities that it could help in the effort to alleviate world hunger. Here is part of their findings: “Purslane is receiving much attention for cultivation by the United States Department of Agriculture as part of their effort to bring about a modification in the western diet with increased intake of fresh fruits and vegetables.”
    Purslane just happens to contain alpha-linolenic acid, one of the highly sought-after Omega-3 fatty acids. Why pay money for fish oil when you can grow your own Omega-3 fatty acids as part of your edible landscaping? Especially when it takes little effort to grow purslane, since it does grow like a weed.

    I have a ten foot back yard and have identified 4 or 5 of these ‘weeds’ growing and used to throw away buckets of them while ‘weeding’ my flower garden! They are already flat, easy to clean and fit just right on a sandwich. My aunt tried to get me to eat them 55 years ago and we all thought she was kookoo. I have a plant spec sheet with a picture of the plant if you want to see how many are growing at your house.

    Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 9:12 pm | Permalink
  4. Sage wrote:

    Grant, I have seen that site…it will be interesting to see the results of the treatment. But I do hold to the fact that Vitamin D is only found in nature in select foods for consumption and the body has very careful mechanisms for absorption. I wonder if the deficiency trend has more to do with how we use/synthesize D rather than our consumption/exposure to it.

    The purslane story is a great example of the awkwardness of federal level policy particularly when it comes to the connections between land/ag health and health of the people. Ideally health care reform would start with intensive soil restoration!

    Thanks for your thoughts Grants. And we do have purslane in our yard…guess I’ll try it out.

    Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. The Goods Are Odd › D is for Duh on Thursday, March 11, 2010 at 12:25 am

    [...] substances in other substances where they don’t necessarily belong. (I talked about this before here, and it doesn’t seem beneficial) Maybe, just maybe, the world works the way it does for a [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*